Photo courtesy of 90 by 20 |
As drought has worsened during the last decade, communities
around the Colorado River basin who rely on the Colorado River for their water
are urged to do their part in water conservation. The 90 by 20 campaign has
been launched by a group of advocacy organizations to direct urban communities’
water usage in better, smarter ways.This campaign is asking communities from Colorado to Utah,
Nevada and Arizona to take the “90 by 20” pledge and try to achieve the
residential water usage rate of 90 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) by 2020.
The Colorado River’s long term sustainability is
threatened by climate change and an increasing water demand. According to the
US Bureau of Reclamation, the temperature rise in the 21st century
could adversely affect the Colorado River’s flow by 9 percent decrease over the
next 50 years. The river, which stretched from the Rocky Mountains to the Seaof Cortez in Mexico until 1998, now ends in the Sonoran Desert, miles away from
its previous destination. From 1971 to 2008, municipal and industrial
consumptions in the river basin increased by 23 percent due to the population
growth and economic activities. “The
region now takes more water from the basin than what Mother Nature supplies.” Evidence
shows the status quo of the Colorado River basin by all means is not
sustainable.
Mountain snowpack in the western US in two consecutive years. (photo courtesy of the 90 by 20) |
“The challenge of increasing demand and decreasing supply is
a Basin-wide problem that demands Basin-wide solutions,” says Drew Beckwith,
the water policy manager for Western Resource Advocate, a nonprofit
environmental law and policy organization that supports the campaign.
Historical 10-year running average Colorado River Basin supply and use (photo courtesy of 90 by 20) http://90by20.org/report.pdf |
The campaign is focused on the cities located in the Colorado
basin. Almost 36 million people from Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona,
California and Mexico rely on the Colorado River as their water resource. The Colorado River basin would save at least
one million acre-feet of water if each household in the region used an average
of 90 GPCD or less. This is enough water to supply agriculture in Arizona or to
provide water needs for three years in Colorado or for two years in Las Vegas.
One important key to achieving the goal of 90 GPDC is a
sound partnership with policy leaders and water conservation groups in each
region like the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA). The campaign efforts to
engage individual residents through communities and social media and encourages
them to find better ways for saving water and putting the region on a
sustainable path.
According to the 90 by 20 reports, 90 GPDC is a realistic goal for residential units. There is no single set of instructions for all the
communities, but the campaign offers the communities to build up their own path
to 90 GPDC according to their needs and preferences. Among the communities in
the basin, many are close to the goal while others need more effort to reach it
e.g. Aurora and Castle Rock in Colorado are already at 90 GPCD, but people in Las
Vegas need to cut off about 35GPCD to show their commitment.
Residential GPCD in the Colorado River Basin by water providers. (photo courtesy of 90 by 20) |
While the program’s supporters are confident that Southern
Nevada residents will reach the goal, some question if the campaign is asking
too much of the residents. They argue that the 90 by 20 massage conflicts with the
SNWA’s goal of 125 GPCD (for outdoor and indoor residential water usage) given
that Southern Nevada doesn’t rely solely on the Colorado River for water and
that it recycles 40 percent of the water it uses back into the river.
“It’s a conservation theme, but it’s like two choirs singing different
songs. It can clash as far as messaging,” Doug Bennett, SNWA Conservation Manager says. “We think it’s
unreasonable for people in different communities to be expected to perform at
the same level.” Some others argue about the California’s allotted
water from the Colorado River and think that if California, like other upstream states, participated in conservation programs, there would be more water left
for the upstream states. Given all these, the program’s main goal for the Southern Nevada residents is to have the phrase “90 by 20” in the back of their minds whenever they use water. The program is in its infancy stage and needs support from the residents and groups such as SNWA to succeed. “Everybody agrees water is the foundation to any community,” Dempsey, the southern Nevada coordinator for the 90 by 20 water conservation campaign says. “You can’t have growth, infrastructure, dining and quality of life without water.”
Great post, Sara. I'm excited to see Las Vegas join cities like Denver in reaching out to the public to address shifts in municipal demand, which seems to get less attention than efforts to increase supply. Clearly there are cities that have been successful in reducing residential water use, and I think that Las Vegas can acheive this as well, but I have to wonder if the city is making it more difficult for itself by solely focusing on behavioral shifts in use. I'd like to see to what extent other large cities like Denver and Tuscon combined this direct request with more subtle infrastructural development. It seems to me that the easier you make outfitting your home with water-saving technology, for example, the more likely those consumption rates will decrease, and without the challenge of changing well established use behavior.
ReplyDeleteInteresting post, Sara! The framing of the 90 by 20 initiative seems similar to the greenhouse gas emission campaigns over the past few years. Its interesting that the campaign is targeting individual, residential water use, rather than the larger users, like agriculture. While it seems like pushing for a decrease in residential use might face the least amount of resistance, I can't help but wonder what opportunities exist for larger water savings through push for conservation measures from larger water users.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
Sarah