Sunday, November 25, 2012

"90 by 20", A New Benchmark in Residential Water Consumption



Photo courtesy of 90 by 20
As drought has worsened during the last decade, communities around the Colorado River basin who rely on the Colorado River for their water are urged to do their part in water conservation. The 90 by 20 campaign has been launched by a group of advocacy organizations to direct urban communities’ water usage in better, smarter ways.This campaign is asking communities from Colorado to Utah, Nevada and Arizona to take the “90 by 20” pledge and try to achieve the residential water usage rate of 90 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) by 2020. 

The Colorado River’s long term sustainability is threatened by climate change and an increasing water demand. According to the US Bureau of Reclamation, the temperature rise in the 21st century could adversely affect the Colorado River’s flow by 9 percent decrease over the next 50 years. The river, which stretched from the Rocky Mountains to the Seaof Cortez in Mexico until 1998, now ends in the Sonoran Desert, miles away from its previous destination. From 1971 to 2008, municipal and industrial consumptions in the river basin increased by 23 percent due to the population growth and economic activities.  “The region now takes more water from the basin than what Mother Nature supplies.” Evidence shows the status quo of the Colorado River basin by all means is not sustainable.

Mountain snowpack in the western US in two consecutive years. (photo courtesy of the 90 by 20)

“The challenge of increasing demand and decreasing supply is a Basin-wide problem that demands Basin-wide solutions,” says Drew Beckwith, the water policy manager for Western Resource Advocate, a nonprofit environmental law and policy organization that supports the campaign.
Historical 10-year running average Colorado River Basin supply and use (photo courtesy of  90 by 20) http://90by20.org/report.pdf

The campaign is focused on the cities located in the Colorado basin. Almost 36 million people from Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, California and Mexico rely on the Colorado River as their water resource.  The Colorado River basin would save at least one million acre-feet of water if each household in the region used an average of 90 GPCD or less. This is enough water to supply agriculture in Arizona or to provide water needs for three years in Colorado or for two years in Las Vegas.

One important key to achieving the goal of 90 GPDC is a sound partnership with policy leaders and water conservation groups in each region like the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA). The campaign efforts to engage individual residents through communities and social media and encourages them to find better ways for saving water and putting the region on a sustainable path.  

According to the 90 by 20 reports, 90 GPDC is a realistic goal for residential units. There is no single set of instructions for all the communities, but the campaign offers the communities to build up their own path to 90 GPDC according to their needs and preferences. Among the communities in the basin, many are close to the goal while others need more effort to reach it e.g. Aurora and Castle Rock in Colorado are already at 90 GPCD, but people in Las Vegas need to cut off about 35GPCD to show their commitment.

Residential GPCD in the Colorado River Basin by water providers. (photo courtesy of 90 by 20)

While the program’s supporters are confident that Southern Nevada residents will reach the goal, some question if the campaign is asking too much of the residents. They argue that the 90 by 20 massage conflicts with the SNWA’s goal of 125 GPCD (for outdoor and indoor residential water usage) given that Southern Nevada doesn’t rely solely on the Colorado River for water and that it recycles 40 percent of the water it uses back into the river.
“It’s a conservation theme, but it’s like two choirs singing different songs. It can clash as far as messaging,” Doug Bennett, SNWA Conservation Manager says. “We think it’s unreasonable for people in different communities to be expected to perform at the same level.”  Some others argue about the California’s allotted water from the Colorado River and think that if California, like other upstream states, participated in conservation programs, there would be more water left for the upstream states.  

Given all these, the program’s main goal for the Southern Nevada residents is to have the phrase “90 by 20” in the back of their minds whenever they use water. The program is in its infancy stage and needs support from the residents and groups such as SNWA to succeed. “Everybody agrees water is the foundation to any community,” Dempsey, the southern Nevada coordinator for the 90 by 20 water conservation campaign says. “You can’t have growth, infrastructure, dining and quality of life without water.”

Friday, November 2, 2012

Rebates that "Make Cents"



The pioneers who established the cities in the west, as Pat Mulroy mentions, tried to recreate the east-coast landscape of lush turf grass, but this type of landscaping is not working anymore. Southern Nevada is facing a drought and the current water resources cannot meet the lavish lifestyle of the residents; it is time to change the wasteful habits. Despite the common belief, casino-hotels are not the real water-waster in the city, but outdoor sprinklers that water lawns and golf courses beyond the Strip account for 70% of southern Nevada’s water use.

Since the SNWA warned the business-owners and residents about the water shortage and upcoming drought in the mid-90s, officials have been struggling to find ways to get people to conserve this rapidly declining resource. The hotel-casino owners were first to adopt water conservation programs; many of them have cut off their outdoor irrigation water by converting to smart-landscaping as  part of their conservation plan.

NYTimes.com - Las Vegas' Changing landscape. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv1zd23f-E0

Water-smart (xeriscape) landscape rebate program
The SNWA adopted the Water Smart Landscape Rebate Program in 2000. This program was the result of a 5-year study of water use reduction through converting turf-grass to drought-tolerant landscaping and plants local to the region. 

Through this program, SNWA pays the residents $1.5 for every square foot of lawn they remove and replace with drought-tolerant landscaping up to the first 5,000 square feet converted per property per year. Beyond the 5,000 square feet, the rebate decreases to $1 per square foot. The maximum award for any property in a fiscal year is $300,000 and certain restrictions apply to well-owners. As a condition of this program, people have to sustain their new water-smart landscape for at least 10 years. The only way to convert the landscape back to turf is through a change of ownership after 10 years. Data shows the new owners usually keep the landscape the way it is and rarely convert back to turf-grass.


The concept of xeriscaping was first introduced by the Denver Water Department in 1978.  Xeriscaping is a method of landscaping which helps reduce the supplemental irrigation water through the use of drought tolerant and plants local to the area.This method is now very popular in many Western and Southern cities, such as Las Vegas, Austin, Albuquerque and Atlanta. (Photo courtesy of TreeHugger) http://www.treehugger.com/corporate-responsibility/5-great-green-ways-us-cities-are-leading-by-example.html
Along with the xeriscape rebate program, the SNWA has adopted other water restrictions to limit further water waste including a mandatory watering schedule for residents and turf limits for different building sectors and new properties. Violation of these restrictions will result in a waste-water fee or termination of water service.

The watering schedule allows people to water their lawn once a week in the winter, every other day in the spring and fall and every day in the summer. Most residents comply with these restrictions. Kim Bavington who has a small, lush piece of grass in the front yard soon has to cut back watering her lawn because of the new restrictions. She says, "I think if you take your sprinkler and time each section, so it's more efficient you can still have a great looking yard."


Studies show landscape conversion has provided a good opportunity for water conservation in the Las Vegas Valley. According to a study by SNWA, while the residents have applied an annual average of 73gallons/sq ft of water to turf grass, only 17.2 gallons/sq ft is needed for xeric landscape areas which means a 74% decrease in irrigation water. Since the implementation of the rebate program in 2000, over 155 million square feet of turf have been converted to water-smart landscaping, saving the city more than 1.5 billion gallons of water each year.

Water Savings Summary from Water Smart Landscapes Rebate Program. (photo courtesy of Western Resource Advocates)
A study by Western Resource Advocates shows that the water saved by the Water Smart Rebate Program will make up for the conversion rebate cost in a 10-year life span of the landscape. According to SNWA, water-smart landscapes are rarely converted after the conditional 10 year period and the change of ownership. Conversion rebates cost SNWA an average of $575per acre-foot of water saved; however, the study has estimated that SNWA Water Smart Landscape Program is cost-effective because SNWA would net $35.8 million for every 10-million square feet of turf grass converted to drought-tolerant landscaping.